The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Measures of trait mindfulness: Convergent validity, shared dimensionality, and linkages to the five-factor model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01164 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A. B. Siegling, K. V. Petrides |
| Abstract |
This study investigated, and partially aimed to replicate, important construct validity aspects and the homogeneity of trait mindfulness measures. Specifically, the study set out to examine whether a single dimension can explain the shared variance among these measures as well as the extent to which they converge with one another and in terms of their linkages to the five-factor model (FFM). Two samples completed all trait measures of the construct and one of them additionally completed a measure of the Big Five personality traits. Results showed that a single dimension explains the shared variance among measures based on the original, Eastern conceptualization of mindfulness, although not all of them seem to represent this construct comprehensively. Intercorrelations, dimensionality analysis, as well as linkages to the FFM indicated that the Eastern and Western conceptualizations, and their respective measures, reflect distinct constructs. However, the amount of variance overlap with the FFM was similar across the two conceptualizations. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 43% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 184 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 31 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 11% |
| Researcher | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 44 | 23% |
| Unknown | 31 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 95 | 50% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 24 | 13% |
| Unknown | 41 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2015.
All research outputs
#6,265,173
of 22,766,595 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#9,060
of 29,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,654
of 255,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#158
of 369 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,766,595 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,681 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,754 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 369 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.