↓ Skip to main content

Are ambiguity aversion and ambiguity intolerance identical? A neuroeconomics investigation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Are ambiguity aversion and ambiguity intolerance identical? A neuroeconomics investigation
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, February 2015
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01550
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yusuke Tanaka, Junya Fujino, Takashi Ideno, Shigetaka Okubo, Kazuhisa Takemura, Jun Miyata, Ryosaku Kawada, Shinsuke Fujimoto, Manabu Kubota, Akihiko Sasamoto, Kimito Hirose, Hideaki Takeuchi, Hidenao Fukuyama, Toshiya Murai, Hidehiko Takahashi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 44 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 20%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Other 3 7%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 12 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 12 26%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 13%
Neuroscience 4 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 12 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,124,741
of 25,920,652 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#4,314
of 34,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,626
of 362,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#87
of 397 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,920,652 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,875 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,898 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 397 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.