↓ Skip to main content

Emotional exhaustion and workload predict clinician-rated and objective patient safety

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
29 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
5 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
269 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
372 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Emotional exhaustion and workload predict clinician-rated and objective patient safety
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2015
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01573
Pubmed ID
Authors

Annalena Welp, Laurenz L. Meier, Tanja Manser

Abstract

To investigate the role of clinician burnout, demographic, and organizational characteristics in predicting subjective and objective indicators of patient safety.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 372 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 372 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 13%
Researcher 43 12%
Student > Bachelor 33 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 5%
Other 79 21%
Unknown 117 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 87 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 60 16%
Psychology 29 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 3%
Social Sciences 12 3%
Other 46 12%
Unknown 126 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2024.
All research outputs
#686,504
of 26,253,210 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#1,418
of 35,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,533
of 362,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#34
of 394 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,253,210 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,683 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 394 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.