The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Linear mixed-effects models for within-participant psychology experiments: an introductory tutorial and free, graphical user interface (LMMgui)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00002 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David A. Magezi |
| Abstract |
Linear mixed-effects models (LMMs) are increasingly being used for data analysis in cognitive neuroscience and experimental psychology, where within-participant designs are common. The current article provides an introductory review of the use of LMMs for within-participant data analysis and describes a free, simple, graphical user interface (LMMgui). LMMgui uses the package lme4 (Bates et al., 2014a,b) in the statistical environment R (R Core Team). |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 15% |
| Australia | 3 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Singapore | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 33 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 27 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 23 | 43% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 689 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 674 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 182 | 26% |
| Researcher | 103 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 83 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 50 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 35 | 5% |
| Other | 104 | 15% |
| Unknown | 132 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 227 | 33% |
| Neuroscience | 66 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 4% |
| Engineering | 27 | 4% |
| Other | 129 | 19% |
| Unknown | 178 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,320,326
of 26,536,755 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#2,778
of 35,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,028
of 363,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#61
of 394 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,536,755 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,648 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 394 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.