The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Beethoven recordings reviewed: a systematic method for mapping the content of music performance criticism
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00057 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elena Alessandri, Victoria J. Williamson, Hubert Eiholzer, Aaron Williamon |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Hong Kong | 1 | 14% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Scientists | 3 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 23 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 17% |
| Professor | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 17% |
| Unknown | 7 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 7 | 29% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 17% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2016.
All research outputs
#6,883,197
of 25,866,425 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#9,763
of 34,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,717
of 269,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#199
of 437 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,866,425 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,845 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 437 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.