The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Inconsistent use of gesture space during abstract pointing impairs language comprehension
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00080 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas C. Gunter, J. E. Douglas Weinbrenner, Henning Holle |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 42 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 19% |
| Researcher | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 19% |
| Unknown | 7 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Linguistics | 11 | 23% |
| Psychology | 10 | 21% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Philosophy | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 9 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2015.
All research outputs
#13,946,847
of 23,630,563 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#13,910
of 31,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,990
of 358,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#260
of 409 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,630,563 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,514 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 409 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.