The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Sounding Black or White: priming identity and biracial speech
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, April 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00457 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah E Gaither, Ariel M Cohen-Goldberg, Calvin L Gidney, Keith B Maddox, Calvin L Gidney, Calvin L Gidney |
| Abstract |
Research has shown that priming one's racial identity can alter a biracial individuals' social behavior, but can such priming also influence their speech? Language is often used as a marker of one's social group membership and studies have shown that social context can affect the style of language that a person chooses to use, but this work has yet to be extended to the biracial population. Audio clips were extracted from a previous study involving biracial Black/White participants who had either their Black or White racial identity primed. Condition-blind coders rated Black-primed biracial participants as sounding significantly more Black and White-primed biracial participants as sounding significantly more White, both when listening to whole (Study 1a) and thin-sliced (Study 1b) clips. Further linguistic analyses (Studies 2a-c) were inconclusive regarding the features that differed between the two groups. Future directions regarding the need to investigate the intersections between social identity priming and language behavior with a biracial lens are discussed. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 33% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 29% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 12% |
| Researcher | 7 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 12 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 34 | 52% |
| Linguistics | 7 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 13 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2018.
All research outputs
#2,378,508
of 26,498,650 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#4,786
of 35,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,588
of 280,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#79
of 480 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,498,650 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,465 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 480 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.