↓ Skip to main content

Assessing motivation and readiness to change for weight management and control: an in-depth evaluation of three sets of instruments

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
177 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessing motivation and readiness to change for weight management and control: an in-depth evaluation of three sets of instruments
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, May 2015
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00511
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martina Ceccarini, Maria Borrello, Giada Pietrabissa, Gian Mauro Manzoni, Gianluca Castelnuovo

Abstract

It is highly recommended to promptly assess motivation and readiness to change (RTC) in individuals who wish to achieve significant lifestyle behavior changes in order to improve their health, overall quality of life, and well-being. In particular, motivation should be assessed for those who face the difficult task to maintain weight, which implies a double challenge: weight loss initially and its management subsequently. In fact, weight-control may be as problematic as smoking or drugs-taking cessation, since they all share the commonality of being highly refractory to change. This paper will examine three well-established tools following the Transtheoretical Model, specifically assessing RTC in weight management: the University of Rhode Island Change Assessment Scale, the S-Weight and the P-Weight and the Decisional Balance Inventory. Though their strengths and weaknesses may appear to be rather homogeneous and similar, the S-Weight and P-Weight are more efficient in assessing RTC in weight management and control. Assessing motivation and RTC may be a crucial step in promptly identifying psychological obstacles or resistance toward weight-management in overweight or obese hospitalized individuals, and it may contribute to provide a more effective weight-control treatment intervention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
Unknown 176 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 11%
Student > Bachelor 19 11%
Researcher 16 9%
Other 38 21%
Unknown 34 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 16%
Psychology 23 13%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 22 12%
Unknown 42 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2016.
All research outputs
#12,819,960
of 22,831,537 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#11,676
of 29,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,836
of 264,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#259
of 507 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,831,537 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,820 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 507 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.