↓ Skip to main content

Editorial: The long and short of mental time travel—self-projection over time-scales large and small

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Editorial: The long and short of mental time travel—self-projection over time-scales large and small
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, May 2015
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00668
Pubmed ID
Authors

James M. Broadway, Claire M. Zedelius, Jonathan W. Schooler, Simon Grondin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Student > Master 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 7 21%
Unknown 11 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 10 29%
Neuroscience 5 15%
Philosophy 2 6%
Arts and Humanities 2 6%
Engineering 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 11 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2021.
All research outputs
#13,202,270
of 22,805,349 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#12,477
of 29,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,231
of 266,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#281
of 519 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,805,349 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,717 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,622 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 519 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.