The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interoception and symptom reporting: disentangling accuracy and bias
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, June 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00732 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sibylle Petersen, Ken Van Staeyen, Claus Vögele, Andreas von Leupoldt, Omer Van den Bergh |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Belgium | 1 | 7% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 67% |
| Scientists | 5 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 96 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 11% |
| Researcher | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 17 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 46 | 47% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 22 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,043,786
of 26,018,952 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#2,214
of 34,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,236
of 282,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#42
of 535 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,018,952 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,957 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,375 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 535 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.