↓ Skip to main content

A dance movement therapy group for depressed adult patients in a psychiatric outpatient clinic: effects of the treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A dance movement therapy group for depressed adult patients in a psychiatric outpatient clinic: effects of the treatment
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, July 2015
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00980
Pubmed ID
Authors

Päivi M. Pylvänäinen, Joona S. Muotka, Raimo Lappalainen

Abstract

We were interested in investigating the effects of dance movement therapy (DMT) in a psychiatric outpatient clinic with patients diagnosed with depression. DMT aims to engage the patients in physical and verbal exploration of their experiences generated in movement based interaction. The assumption was that DMT, which includes both physical engagement as well as emotional and social exploration, would alleviate the mood and psychiatric symptoms. All adult patients (n = 33) included in the study received treatment as usual (TAU). Twenty-one patients participated in a 12-session DMT group intervention, and the remaining 12 patients chose to take TAU only. The majority of the patients suffered from moderate or severe depression, recurrent and/or chronic type. The effects of the interventions were investigated after the intervention, and at 3-month follow-up. Compared to the TAU, adding DMT seemed to improve the effect of the treatment. The effect of the DMT was observable whether the patient was taking antidepressant medication or not. At follow-up, between group effect sizes (ES) were medium in favor for the DMT group (d = 0.60-0.79). In the DMT group, the within ES at the 3 months follow-up varied from 0.62 to 0.82 as compared to TAU 0.15-0.37. The results indicated that DMT is beneficial in the treatment of depressed patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 145 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 22%
Student > Bachelor 30 20%
Researcher 9 6%
Student > Postgraduate 9 6%
Lecturer 8 5%
Other 23 16%
Unknown 35 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 43 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 8%
Social Sciences 10 7%
Sports and Recreations 8 5%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 37 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2017.
All research outputs
#2,615,392
of 24,820,264 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#5,153
of 33,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,460
of 268,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#110
of 564 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,820,264 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,482 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,396 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 564 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.