↓ Skip to main content

Four broad temperament dimensions: description, convergent validation correlations, and comparison with the Big Five

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
16 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Four broad temperament dimensions: description, convergent validation correlations, and comparison with the Big Five
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, August 2015
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01098
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helen E. Fisher, Heide D. Island, Jonathan Rich, Daniel Marchalik, Lucy L. Brown

Abstract

A new temperament construct based on recent brain physiology literature has been investigated using the Fisher Temperament Inventory (FTI). Four collections of behaviors emerged, each associated with a specific neural system: the dopamine, serotonin, testosterone, and estrogen/oxytocin system. These four temperament suites have been designated: (1) Curious/Energetic, (2) Cautious/Social Norm Compliant, (3) Analytical/Tough-minded, and (4) Prosocial/Empathetic temperament dimensions. Two functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have suggested that the FTI can measure the influence of these neural systems. In this paper, to further the behavioral validation and characterization of the four proposed temperament dimensions, we measured correlations with five variables: (1) gender; (2) level of education; (3) religious preference; (4) political orientation; (5) the degree to which an individual regards sex as essential to a successful relationship. Subjects were 39,913 anonymous members of a US Internet dating site and 70,000+ members in six other countries. Correlations with the five variables characterize the FTI and are consistent with mechanisms using the proposed neuromodulators. We also report on an analysis between the FTI and the NEO-Five Factor Inventory, using a college sample (n = 215), which showed convergent validity. The results provide novel correlates not available in other questionnaires: religiosity, political orientation, and attitudes about sex in a relationship. Also, an Eigen analysis replicated the four clusters of co-varying items. The FTI, with its broad systems and non-pathologic factors complements existing personality questionnaires. It provides an index of some brain systems that contribute to temperament, and may be useful in psychotherapy, business, medicine, and the legal community.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 123 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 12%
Student > Master 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 9%
Researcher 8 6%
Other 23 18%
Unknown 40 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 39 30%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Neuroscience 7 5%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 45 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,052,004
of 26,177,473 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#2,235
of 35,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,651
of 276,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#48
of 551 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,177,473 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,056 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,364 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 551 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.