↓ Skip to main content

The relevance of stretch intensity and position—a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
20 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
video
3 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
390 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The relevance of stretch intensity and position—a systematic review
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, August 2015
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01128
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nikos Apostolopoulos, George S. Metsios, Andreas D. Flouris, Yiannis Koutedakis, Matthew A. Wyon

Abstract

Stretching exercises to increase the range of motion (ROM) of joints have been used by sports coaches and medical professionals for improving performance and rehabilitation. The ability of connective and muscular tissues to change their architecture in response to stretching is important for their proper function, repair, and performance. Given the dearth of relevant data in the literature, this review examined two key elements of stretching: stretch intensity and stretch position; and their significance to ROM, delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS), and inflammation in different populations. A search of three databases, Pub-Med, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Reviews, identified 152 articles, which were subsequently categorized into four groups: athletes (24), clinical (29), elderly (12), and general population (87). The use of different populations facilitated a wider examination of the stretching components and their effects. All 152 articles incorporated information regarding duration, frequency and stretch position, whereas only 79 referred to the intensity of stretching and 22 of these 79 studies were deemed high quality. It appears that the intensity of stretching is relatively under-researched, and the importance of body position and its influence on stretch intensity, is largely unknown. In conclusion, this review has highlighted areas for future research, including stretch intensity and position and their effect on musculo-tendinous tissue, in relation to the sensation of pain, delayed onset muscle soreness, inflammation, as well as muscle health and performance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 390 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 386 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 80 21%
Student > Master 55 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 5%
Student > Postgraduate 17 4%
Other 67 17%
Unknown 127 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 74 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 63 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 56 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 3%
Social Sciences 8 2%
Other 30 8%
Unknown 147 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 115. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2023.
All research outputs
#387,690
of 26,499,616 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#817
of 35,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,410
of 278,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#15
of 561 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,499,616 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 561 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.