The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Occupational coping self-efficacy explains distress and well-being in nurses beyond psychosocial job characteristics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, August 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01143 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Renato Pisanti, Margot van der Doef, Stan Maes, Caterina Lombardo, David Lazzari, Cristiano Violani |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 143 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 11% |
| Researcher | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 21 | 15% |
| Unknown | 51 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 26 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Unknown | 53 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2016.
All research outputs
#20,356,726
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#23,692
of 34,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,830
of 277,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#424
of 548 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,760 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,264 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 548 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.