The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Moral judgment as information processing: an integrative review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, October 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01637 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Steve Guglielmo |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 10% |
| Germany | 2 | 10% |
| Italy | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 16 | 76% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 71% |
| Scientists | 4 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 181 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 7% |
| Researcher | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 34 | 18% |
| Unknown | 27 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 98 | 53% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 10 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 4% |
| Philosophy | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 11% |
| Unknown | 36 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,993,161
of 26,381,140 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#5,945
of 35,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,635
of 296,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#94
of 488 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,381,140 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,285 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,199 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 488 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.