The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Relationship Between Specific Pavlovian Instrumental Transfer and Instrumental Reward Probability
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, November 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01697 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emilio Cartoni, Tania Moretta, Stefano Puglisi-Allegra, Simona Cabib, Gianluca Baldassarre |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 85 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 24% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
| Researcher | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 22 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 34 | 39% |
| Neuroscience | 16 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 28 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2015.
All research outputs
#23,391,126
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#27,767
of 34,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#338,955
of 398,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#401
of 441 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,796 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,210 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 441 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.