You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Role of Intelligence Quotient and Emotional Intelligence in Cognitive Control Processes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01853 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Purificación Checa, Pablo Fernández-Berrocal |
| Abstract |
The relationship between intelligence quotient (IQ) and cognitive control processes has been extensively established. Several studies have shown that IQ correlates with cognitive control abilities, such as interference suppression, as measured with experimental tasks like the Stroop and Flanker tasks. By contrast, there is a debate about the role of Emotional Intelligence (EI) in individuals' cognitive control abilities. The aim of this study is to examine the relation between IQ and EI, and cognitive control abilities evaluated by a typical laboratory control cognitive task, the Stroop task. Results show a negative correlation between IQ and the interference suppression index, the ability to inhibit processing of irrelevant information. However, the Managing Emotions dimension of EI measured by the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT), but not self-reported of EI, negatively correlates with the impulsivity index, the premature execution of the response. These results suggest that not only is IQ crucial, but also competences related to EI are essential to human cognitive control processes. Limitations and implications of these results are also discussed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 16% |
| Spain | 3 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 88% |
| Scientists | 2 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 187 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 31 | 16% |
| Unknown | 56 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 55 | 29% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 9 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 29 | 15% |
| Unknown | 63 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,205,963
of 25,923,151 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#2,531
of 34,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,666
of 397,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#50
of 453 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,923,151 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,875 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,792 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 453 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.