↓ Skip to main content

Editorial: Improving Bayesian Reasoning: What Works and Why?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Editorial: Improving Bayesian Reasoning: What Works and Why?
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, December 2015
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01872
Pubmed ID
Authors

David R. Mandel, Gorka Navarrete

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 3%
Hungary 1 3%
Italy 1 3%
Luxembourg 1 3%
Unknown 25 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 28%
Student > Master 3 10%
Other 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Professor 2 7%
Other 7 24%
Unknown 3 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 12 41%
Computer Science 3 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 4 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2017.
All research outputs
#7,474,859
of 22,851,489 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#10,941
of 29,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,251
of 387,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#192
of 454 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,851,489 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,874 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,652 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 454 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.