↓ Skip to main content

Prosodic Structure as a Parallel to Musical Structure

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prosodic Structure as a Parallel to Musical Structure
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, December 2015
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01962
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher C. Heffner, L. Robert Slevc

Abstract

What structural properties do language and music share? Although early speculation identified a wide variety of possibilities, the literature has largely focused on the parallels between musical structure and syntactic structure. Here, we argue that parallels between musical structure and prosodic structure deserve more attention. We review the evidence for a link between musical and prosodic structure and find it to be strong. In fact, certain elements of prosodic structure may provide a parsimonious comparison with musical structure without sacrificing empirical findings related to the parallels between language and music. We then develop several predictions related to such a hypothesis.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Norway 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 124 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 27%
Student > Master 18 14%
Researcher 15 12%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 22 17%
Unknown 17 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 34 26%
Linguistics 29 22%
Arts and Humanities 19 15%
Neuroscience 10 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 20 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2024.
All research outputs
#4,489,002
of 26,313,853 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#7,823
of 35,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,853
of 400,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#117
of 417 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,313,853 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,165 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 417 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.