The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effect of Frustration on Brain Activation Pattern in Subjects with Different Temperament
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01989 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria Bierzynska, Maksymilian Bielecki, Artur Marchewka, Weronika Debowska, Anna Duszyk, Wojciech Zajkowski, Marcel Falkiewicz, Anna Nowicka, Jan Strelau, Malgorzata Kossut |
| Abstract |
In spite of the prevalence of frustration in everyday life, very few neuroimaging studies were focused on this emotional state. In the current study we aimed to examine effects of frustration on brain activity while performing a well-learned task in participants with low and high tolerance for arousal. Prior to the functional magnetic resonance imaging session, the subjects underwent 2 weeks of Braille reading training. Frustration induction was obtained by using a novel highly difficult tactile task based on discrimination of Braille-like raised dots patterns and negative feedback. Effectiveness of this procedure has been confirmed in a pilot study using galvanic skin response and questionnaires. Brain activation pattern during tactile discrimination task before and after frustration were compared directly. Results revealed changes in brain activity in structures mostly reported in acute stress studies: striatum, cingulate cortex, insula, middle frontal gyrus and precuneus and in structures engaged in tactile Braille discrimination: SI and SII. Temperament type affected activation pattern. Subjects with low tolerance for arousal showed higher activation in the posterior cingulate gyrus, precuneus, and inferior parietal lobule than high reactivity group. Even though performance in the discrimination trials following frustration was unaltered, we observed increased activity of primary and secondary somatosensory cortex processing the tactile information. We interpret this effect as an indicator of additional involvement required to counteract the effects of frustration. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Greece | 2 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 12 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 81% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Poland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 95 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
| Researcher | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 16% |
| Unknown | 24 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 32 | 33% |
| Neuroscience | 13 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 27 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2022.
All research outputs
#930,493
of 25,888,937 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#1,977
of 34,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,042
of 403,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#50
of 449 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,888,937 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,854 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 449 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.