↓ Skip to main content

Subjective Well-Being, Test Anxiety, Academic Achievement: Testing for Reciprocal Effects

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
205 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
303 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Subjective Well-Being, Test Anxiety, Academic Achievement: Testing for Reciprocal Effects
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2016
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01994
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ricarda Steinmayr, Julia Crede, Nele McElvany, Linda Wirthwein

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 303 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 298 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 17%
Student > Bachelor 40 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 5%
Researcher 14 5%
Other 43 14%
Unknown 108 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 99 33%
Social Sciences 24 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 2%
Other 32 11%
Unknown 120 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2024.
All research outputs
#7,336,166
of 26,579,895 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#10,355
of 35,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,385
of 404,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#175
of 437 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,579,895 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,523 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,476 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 437 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.