↓ Skip to main content

eHealth for Patient Engagement: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
30 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
330 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
534 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
eHealth for Patient Engagement: A Systematic Review
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2016
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Serena Barello, Stefano Triberti, Guendalina Graffigna, Chiara Libreri, Silvia Serino, Judith Hibbard, Giuseppe Riva

Abstract

eHealth interventions are recognized to have a tremendous potential to promote patient engagement. To date, the majority of studies examine the efficacy of eHealth in enhancing clinical outcomes without focusing on patient engagement in its specificity. This paper aimed at reviewing findings from the literature about the use of eHealth in engaging patients in their own care process. We undertook a comprehensive literature search within the peer-reviewed international literature. Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria. eHealth interventions reviewed were mainly devoted to foster only partial dimensions of patient engagement (i.e., alternatively cognitive, emotional or behavioral domains related to healthcare management), thus failing to consider the complexity of such an experience. This also led to a great heterogeneity of technologies, assessed variables and achieved outcomes. This systematic review underlines the need for a more holistic view of patient needs to actually engage them in eHealth interventions and obtaining positive outcomes. In this sense, patient engagement constitute a new frontiers for healthcare models where eHealth could maximize its potentialities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 534 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 524 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 99 19%
Student > Master 80 15%
Researcher 59 11%
Student > Bachelor 42 8%
Student > Postgraduate 26 5%
Other 93 17%
Unknown 135 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 78 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 58 11%
Psychology 54 10%
Social Sciences 43 8%
Computer Science 39 7%
Other 97 18%
Unknown 165 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,178,981
of 23,509,982 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#2,419
of 31,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,929
of 397,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#62
of 438 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,509,982 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,332 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 438 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.