↓ Skip to main content

How Redundant Are Redundant Color Adjectives? An Efficiency-Based Analysis of Color Overspecification

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How Redundant Are Redundant Color Adjectives? An Efficiency-Based Analysis of Color Overspecification
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, February 2016
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00153
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paula Rubio-Fernández

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Unknown 55 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 33%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Master 5 9%
Other 2 4%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 11 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 19 33%
Psychology 11 19%
Computer Science 3 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Unspecified 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 15 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2024.
All research outputs
#18,043,847
of 26,404,318 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#21,851
of 35,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,554
of 313,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#383
of 521 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,404,318 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,330 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 521 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.