↓ Skip to main content

The Impact of Bilingualism on Working Memory: A Null Effect on the Whole May Not Be So on the Parts

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
50 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Impact of Bilingualism on Working Memory: A Null Effect on the Whole May Not Be So on the Parts
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, February 2016
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00265
Pubmed ID
Authors

Noelia Calvo, Agustín Ibáñez, Adolfo M. García

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 129 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 22%
Student > Bachelor 25 19%
Student > Master 21 16%
Researcher 6 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 23 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 46 36%
Linguistics 26 20%
Neuroscience 8 6%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Arts and Humanities 3 2%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 28 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2017.
All research outputs
#1,015,985
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#2,136
of 34,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,964
of 316,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#51
of 480 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,796 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 480 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.