↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of Measures of Ability in Adolescents with Intellectual Disability

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of Measures of Ability in Adolescents with Intellectual Disability
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, May 2016
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00683
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chantanee Mungkhetklang, Sheila G. Crewther, Edith L. Bavin, Nahal Goharpey, Carl Parsons

Abstract

Finding the most appropriate intelligence test for adolescents with Intellectual Disability (ID) is challenging given their limited language, attention, perceptual, and motor skills and ability to stay on task. The study compared performance of 23 adolescents with ID on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fourth Edition (WISC-IV), one of the most widely used intelligence tests, and three non-verbal IQ tests, the Raven's Colored Progressive Matrices (RCPM), the Test of Non-verbal Intelligence-Fourth Edition and the Wechsler Non-verbal test of Ability. Results showed that the WISC-IV Full Scale IQ raw and scaled scores were highly correlated with total scores from the three non-verbal tests, although the correlations were higher for raw scores, suggesting they may lead to better understanding of within group differences and what individuals with ID can do at the time of assessment. All participants attempted more questions on the non-verbal tests than the verbal. A preliminary analysis showed that adolescents with ID without ASD (n = 15) achieved higher scores overall than those presenting with ID+ASD (n = 8). Our findings support the view that short non-verbal tests are more likely to give a similar IQ result as obtained from the WISC-IV. In terms of the time to administer and the stress for participants, they are more appropriate for assessing adolescents with ID.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Professor 6 9%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 15 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 23 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 9%
Social Sciences 5 7%
Sports and Recreations 4 6%
Neuroscience 4 6%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 19 28%