↓ Skip to main content

The Relationship between Sitting and the Use of Symmetry As a Cue to Figure-Ground Assignment in 6.5-Month-Old Infants

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Relationship between Sitting and the Use of Symmetry As a Cue to Figure-Ground Assignment in 6.5-Month-Old Infants
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, May 2016
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00759
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shannon Ross-Sheehy, Sammy Perone, Shaun P. Vecera, Lisa M. Oakes

Abstract

Two experiments examined the relationship between emerging sitting ability and sensitivity to symmetry as a cue to figure-ground (FG) assignment in 6.5-month-old infants (N = 80). In each experiment, infants who could sit unassisted (as indicated by parental report in Experiment 1 and by an in-lab assessment in Experiment 2) exhibited sensitivity to symmetry as a cue to FG assignment, whereas non-sitting infants did not. Experiment 2 further revealed that sensitivity to this cue is not related to general cognitive abilities as indexed using a non-related visual habituation task. Results demonstrate an important relationship between motor development and visual perception and further suggest that the achievement of important motor milestones such as stable sitting may be related to qualitative changes in sensitivity to monocular depth assignment cues such as symmetry.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Student > Master 5 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 11%
Professor 4 9%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 10 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 16 36%
Neuroscience 6 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 12 27%