↓ Skip to main content

Fine Motor Skills Predict Maths Ability Better than They Predict Reading Ability in the Early Primary School Years

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
23 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
281 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fine Motor Skills Predict Maths Ability Better than They Predict Reading Ability in the Early Primary School Years
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, May 2016
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00783
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicola J. Pitchford, Chiara Papini, Laura A. Outhwaite, Anthea Gulliford

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 281 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 280 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 11%
Student > Bachelor 32 11%
Researcher 21 7%
Lecturer 16 6%
Other 56 20%
Unknown 80 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 65 23%
Sports and Recreations 26 9%
Social Sciences 26 9%
Computer Science 11 4%
Neuroscience 10 4%
Other 44 16%
Unknown 99 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2024.
All research outputs
#1,299,317
of 26,530,858 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#2,740
of 35,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,700
of 356,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#55
of 440 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,530,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,485 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 440 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.