↓ Skip to main content

Editorial: Better Together: A Joined-Up Psychological Approach to Health, Well-Being, and Rehabilitation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Editorial: Better Together: A Joined-Up Psychological Approach to Health, Well-Being, and Rehabilitation
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, June 2016
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00974
Pubmed ID
Authors

Donal G. Fortune, Elaine L. Kinsella, Orla M. Muldoon

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 4 17%
Student > Master 3 13%
Other 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 9%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 6 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 4 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 9%
Social Sciences 2 9%
Engineering 2 9%
Sports and Recreations 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 9 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2016.
All research outputs
#8,175,364
of 26,363,900 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#11,548
of 35,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,464
of 370,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#180
of 394 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,363,900 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,207 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,477 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 394 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.