↓ Skip to main content

Emerging Executive Functioning and Motor Development in Infants at High and Low Risk for Autism Spectrum Disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Emerging Executive Functioning and Motor Development in Infants at High and Low Risk for Autism Spectrum Disorder
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, July 2016
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01016
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tanya St. John, Annette M. Estes, Stephen R. Dager, Penelope Kostopoulos, Jason J. Wolff, Juhi Pandey, Jed T. Elison, Sarah J. Paterson, Robert T. Schultz, Kelly Botteron, Heather Hazlett, Joseph Piven

Abstract

Existing evidence suggests executive functioning (EF) deficits may be present in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) by 3 years of age. It is less clear when, prior to 3 years, EF deficits may emerge and how EF unfold over time. The contribution of motor skill difficulties to poorer EF in children with ASD has not been systematically studied. We investigated the developmental trajectory of EF in infants at high and low familial risk for ASD (HR and LR) and the potential associations between motor skills, diagnostic group, and EF performance. Participants included 186 HR and 76 LR infants. EF (A-not-B), motor skills (Fine and Gross Motor), and cognitive ability were directly assessed at 12 months and 24 months of age. Participants were directly evaluated for ASD at 24 months using DSM-IV-TR criteria and categorized as HR-ASD, HR-Negative, and LR-Negative. HR-ASD and HR-Negative siblings demonstrated less improvement in EF over time compared to the LR-Negative group. Motor skills were associated with group and EF performance at 12 months. No group differences were found at 12 months, but at 24 months, the HR-ASD and HR-Negative groups performed worse than the LR-Negative group overall after controlling for visual reception and maternal education. On reversal trials, the HR-ASD group performed worse than the LR-Negative group. Motor skills were associated with group and EF performance on reversal trials at 24 months. Findings suggest that HR siblings demonstrate altered EF development and that motor skills may play an important role in this process.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Greece 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 164 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 17%
Student > Master 25 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Other 34 20%
Unknown 31 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 62 37%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 11%
Neuroscience 14 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 6%
Sports and Recreations 7 4%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 34 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2016.
All research outputs
#15,553,997
of 24,652,720 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#16,493
of 33,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#212,915
of 362,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#263
of 394 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,652,720 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,258 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 394 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.