↓ Skip to main content

Evidence-Based Practice and Psychological Treatments: The Imperatives of Informed Consent

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
28 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evidence-Based Practice and Psychological Treatments: The Imperatives of Informed Consent
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, August 2016
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01170
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charlotte R. Blease, Scott O. Lilienfeld, John M. Kelley

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 108 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 14%
Student > Master 15 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 11%
Researcher 8 7%
Other 23 21%
Unknown 21 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 58 52%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 6%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Neuroscience 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 25 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2016.
All research outputs
#2,096,987
of 26,557,909 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#4,295
of 35,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,111
of 375,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#85
of 388 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,557,909 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,504 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 388 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.