↓ Skip to main content

Why Are There Failures of Systematicity? The Empirical Costs and Benefits of Inducing Universal Constructions

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Why Are There Failures of Systematicity? The Empirical Costs and Benefits of Inducing Universal Constructions
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, August 2016
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01310
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steven Phillips, Yuji Takeda, Fumie Sugimoto

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 7%
Unknown 13 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 29%
Student > Bachelor 3 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Professor 1 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 3 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 4 29%
Engineering 2 14%
Linguistics 1 7%
Computer Science 1 7%
Mathematics 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2022.
All research outputs
#18,869,783
of 23,381,576 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#22,990
of 31,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#260,488
of 339,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#332
of 402 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,381,576 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,115 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,284 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 402 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.