↓ Skip to main content

The Anatomy of Action Systems: Task Differentiation When Learning an EMG Controlled Game

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Anatomy of Action Systems: Task Differentiation When Learning an EMG Controlled Game
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, December 2016
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01945
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ludger van Dijk, Anniek Heerschop, Corry K. van der Sluis, Raoul M. Bongers

Abstract

This study aims to determine to what extent the task for an action system in its initial development relies on functional and anatomical components. Fifty-two able-bodied participants were randomly assigned to one of three experimental groups or to a control group. As a pre- and post-test all groups performed a computer game with the same goal and using the same musculature. One experimental group also trained to perform this test, while the other two experimental groups learned to perform a game that differed either in its goal or in the musculature used. The observed change in accuracy indicated that retaining the goal of the task or the musculature used equally increased transfer performance relative to controls. Conversely, changing either the goal or the musculature equally decreased transfer relative to training the test. These results suggest that in the initial development of an action system, the task to which the system pertains is not specified solely by either the goal of the task or the anatomical structures involved. It is suggested that functional specificity and anatomical dependence might equally be outcomes of continuously differentiating activity.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 23%
Student > Master 7 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 12 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 16%
Psychology 5 11%
Engineering 5 11%
Neuroscience 5 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 13 30%