The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Understanding Risky Behavior: The Influence of Cognitive, Emotional and Hormonal Factors on Decision-Making under Risk
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00102 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Petko Kusev, Harry Purser, Renata Heilman, Alex J. Cooke, Paul Van Schaik, Victoria Baranova, Rose Martin, Peter Ayton |
| Abstract |
Financial risky decisions and evaluations pervade many human everyday activities. Scientific research in such decision-making typically explores the influence of socio-economic and cognitive factors on financial behavior. However, very little research has explored the holistic influence of contextual, emotional, and hormonal factors on preferences for risk in insurance and investment behaviors. Accordingly, the goal of this review article is to address the complexity of individual risky behavior and its underlying psychological factors, as well as to critically examine current regulations on financial behavior. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 293 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 288 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 39 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 7% |
| Researcher | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 47 | 16% |
| Unknown | 100 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 72 | 25% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 27 | 9% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 20 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 14 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 4% |
| Other | 35 | 12% |
| Unknown | 113 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 170. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2022.
All research outputs
#211,148
of 23,578,176 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#438
of 31,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,102
of 422,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#13
of 459 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,578,176 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,459 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 459 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.