↓ Skip to main content

Touchscreen Tablets: Coordinating Action and Perception for Mathematical Cognition

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Touchscreen Tablets: Coordinating Action and Perception for Mathematical Cognition
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, February 2017
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00144
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carolien A. C. G. Duijzer, Shakila Shayan, Arthur Bakker, Marieke F. Van der Schaaf, Dor Abrahamson

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 117 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 13%
Student > Master 13 11%
Lecturer 11 9%
Researcher 9 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Other 24 20%
Unknown 38 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 28 24%
Social Sciences 19 16%
Mathematics 11 9%
Computer Science 8 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 41 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2020.
All research outputs
#6,083,596
of 22,940,083 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#8,644
of 30,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,108
of 420,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#206
of 464 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,940,083 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,092 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 464 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.