↓ Skip to main content

Spanish Adaptation and Validation of the Outcome Questionnaire OQ-30.2

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spanish Adaptation and Validation of the Outcome Questionnaire OQ-30.2
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, May 2017
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00673
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paula Errázuriz, Sebastián Opazo, Alex Behn, Oscar Silva, Sergio Gloger

Abstract

This study assessed the psychometric properties of a Spanish version of the Shortened Outcome Questionnaire (OQ-30.2, Lambert et al., 2004) validated with a sample of 546 patients in an outpatient mental health clinic and 100 non-clinical adults in Chile. Our results show that this measure has similar normative data to the original measure, with a cutoff score for the Chilean population set at 43.36, and the reliable change index at 14. This Spanish OQ-30.2 has good internal consistency (α = 0.90), has concurrent validity with the Depressive, Anxious, and Somatoform disorders measuring scale (Alvarado and Vera, 1991), and is sensitive to change during psychotherapy. Consistent with previous studies, factorial analyses showed that both, the one-factor solution for a general scale and the three-factor solution containing three theoretical scales yielded poor fit estimates. Overall, our results are similar to past research on the OQ-45 and the OQ-30. The short version has adequate psychometric properties, comparable to those of the OQ-45, but provides a gain in application time that could be relevant in the setting of psychotherapy research with large samples, frequent assessments over time, and/or samples that may require more assistance completing items (e.g., low-literacy). We conclude that this measure will be a valuable instrument for research and clinical practice.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 23%
Student > Master 7 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 18 58%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 10%
Social Sciences 3 10%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Unknown 6 19%