The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Measures of Dogs' Inhibitory Control Abilities Do Not Correlate across Tasks
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00849 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Désirée Brucks, Sarah Marshall-Pescini, Lisa Jessica Wallis, Ludwig Huber, Friederike Range |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| United States | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 15 | 79% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 74% |
| Scientists | 4 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 95 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 20% |
| Researcher | 18 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 17% |
| Unknown | 21 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 30% |
| Psychology | 17 | 18% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 7 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 28 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 173. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2024.
All research outputs
#249,544
of 26,505,350 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#532
of 35,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,924
of 332,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#21
of 605 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,505,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,470 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 605 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.