The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Team Resilience as a Second-Order Emergent State: A Theoretical Model and Research Directions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, August 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01360 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Clint Bowers, Christine Kreutzer, Janis Cannon-Bowers, Jerry Lamb |
| Abstract |
Resilience has been recognized as an important phenomenon for understanding how individuals overcome difficult situations. However, it is not only individuals who face difficulties; it is not uncommon for teams to experience adversity. When they do, they must be able to overcome these challenges without performance decrements.This manuscript represents a theoretical model that might be helpful in conceptualizing this important construct. Specifically, it describes team resilience as a second-order emergent state. We also include research propositions that follow from the model. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 19% |
| Canada | 4 | 9% |
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 27 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 51% |
| Scientists | 16 | 34% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 238 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 238 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 48 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 9% |
| Researcher | 20 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 8% |
| Other | 44 | 18% |
| Unknown | 53 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 63 | 26% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 36 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 3% |
| Engineering | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 40 | 17% |
| Unknown | 68 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,382,742
of 25,931,626 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#2,897
of 34,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,703
of 331,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#64
of 578 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,931,626 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,883 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,437 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 578 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.