The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Editorial: Underrepresentation of Women in Science: International and Cross-Disciplinary Evidence and Debate
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02352 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wendy M. Williams |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Greece | 1 | 7% |
| Germany | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 12 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 67% |
| Scientists | 3 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 18% |
| Unknown | 14 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 6 | 14% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 25% |
| Unknown | 15 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2018.
All research outputs
#4,492,203
of 26,362,847 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#7,811
of 35,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,264
of 456,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#167
of 536 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,362,847 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,241 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 536 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.