The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How Executive Functions Are Evaluated in Children and Adolescents with Cerebral Palsy? A Systematic Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00021 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Armanda Pereira, Sílvia Lopes, Paula Magalhães, Adriana Sampaio, Elisa Chaleta, Pedro Rosário |
| Abstract |
Aims: The aim of the present study was to examine how executive functions are assessed in children and adolescents with Cerebral Palsy.Method:A systematic literature review was conducted using four bibliographic databases (WebScience, Scopus, PubMed, and Psycinfo), and only studies that evaluated at least one executive function were selected. Both the research and reporting of results were based on Cochrane's recommendations and PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines.Results:The instrument most frequently used was the D-KEFS. All studies point to the existence of impairments in the executive functions among children and adolescents with Cerebral Palsy with an impact on several cognitive and life domains.Interpretation:There is a need to further systematize the research protocols to study the executive functions and their assessment in the intervention context. Findings of this review presented a diversity of tests (e.g., D-KEFS) or tasks (e.g., The inhibitory ability task) used with children with Cerebral Palsy. However, no information was given about adaptations performed to the test/task to meet Cerebral Palsy's specificities. Future research could consider including this information, which is key both to researchers and practitioners. The results of this study have important implications and suggestions for future avenues and guidelines for research and practice. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 77 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Researcher | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 36 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 21 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 40 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2021.
All research outputs
#13,577,300
of 23,015,156 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#13,489
of 30,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,777
of 437,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#303
of 503 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,015,156 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,265 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,298 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 503 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.