↓ Skip to main content

Job Satisfaction, Organizational Commitment and Job Involvement: The Mediating Role of Job Involvement

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
143 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
878 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Job Satisfaction, Organizational Commitment and Job Involvement: The Mediating Role of Job Involvement
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, February 2018
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00132
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jelena Ćulibrk, Milan Delić, Slavica Mitrović, Dubravko Ćulibrk

Abstract

We conducted an empirical study aimed at identifying and quantifying the relationship between work characteristics, organizational commitment, job satisfaction, job involvement and organizational policies and procedures in the transition economy of Serbia, South Eastern Europe. The study, which included 566 persons, employed by 8 companies, revealed that existing models of work motivation need to be adapted to fit the empirical data, resulting in a revised research model elaborated in the paper. In the proposed model, job involvement partially mediates the effect of job satisfaction on organizational commitment. Job satisfaction in Serbia is affected by work characteristics but, contrary to many studies conducted in developed economies, organizational policies and procedures do not seem significantly affect employee satisfaction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 878 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 878 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 95 11%
Student > Bachelor 91 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 6%
Lecturer 50 6%
Researcher 32 4%
Other 123 14%
Unknown 435 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 179 20%
Social Sciences 56 6%
Psychology 48 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 32 4%
Engineering 23 3%
Other 100 11%
Unknown 440 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,221,185
of 23,098,660 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#2,484
of 30,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,140
of 337,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#68
of 533 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,098,660 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,491 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 533 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.