The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Emotion Recognition as a Real Strength in Williams Syndrome: Evidence From a Dynamic Non-verbal Task
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00463 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laure Ibernon, Claire Touchet, Régis Pochon |
| Abstract |
The hypersocial profile characterizing individuals with Williams syndrome (WS), and particularly their attraction to human faces and their desire to form relationships with other people, could favor the development of their emotion recognition capacities. This study seeks to better understand the development of emotion recognition capacities in WS. The ability to recognize six emotions was assessed in 15 participants with WS. Their performance was compared to that of 15 participants with Down syndrome (DS) and 15 typically developing (TD) children of the same non-verbal developmental age, as assessed with Raven's Colored Progressive Matrices (RCPM; Raven et al., 1998). The analysis of the three groups' results revealed that the participants with WS performed better than the participants with DS and also than the TD children. Individuals with WS performed at a similar level to TD participants in terms of recognizing different types of emotions. The study of development trajectories confirmed that the participants with WS presented the same development profile as the TD participants. These results seem to indicate that the recognition of emotional facial expressions constitutes a real strength in people with WS. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 3 | 38% |
| Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 17 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 15 | 34% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 19 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2018.
All research outputs
#5,919,174
of 23,028,364 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#8,459
of 30,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,264
of 329,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#242
of 580 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,028,364 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,291 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,651 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 580 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.