↓ Skip to main content

Applying Linear Mixed Effects Models (LMMs) in Within-Participant Designs With Subjective Trial-Based Assessments of Awareness—a Caveat

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Applying Linear Mixed Effects Models (LMMs) in Within-Participant Designs With Subjective Trial-Based Assessments of Awareness—a Caveat
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, May 2018
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00788
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guido Hesselmann

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 26%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 14 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 14 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Neuroscience 3 6%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 19 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2019.
All research outputs
#5,674,836
of 23,047,237 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#8,164
of 30,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,472
of 330,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#271
of 656 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,047,237 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,358 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 656 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.