The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Lexical Approach to Identifying Dimensions of Organizational Culture
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00876 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Derek S. Chapman, Paige Reeves, Michelle Chapin |
| Abstract |
A comprehensive measure of organizational culture was developed using a lexical approach, a method typically employed within the study of personality. 1761 adjectives were narrowed down and factor analyzed, which resulted in the identification of a nine factor solution to organizational culture, including the dimensions of: Innovative, Dominant, Pace, Friendly, Prestigious, Trendy, Corporate Social Responsibility, Traditional, and Diverse. Comprised of 135 adjectives most frequently used in describing organizational culture by current employees of several hundred organizations, the Lexical Organizational Culture Scale (LOCS) was found to predict employee commitment, job satisfaction, job search behaviors, and subjective fit better than earlier scales of organizational culture. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Researcher | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 28 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 9 | 13% |
| Psychology | 9 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 29 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2019.
All research outputs
#13,179,163
of 23,576,969 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#11,873
of 31,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,635
of 330,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#363
of 659 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,576,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,458 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 659 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.