↓ Skip to main content

Does Sleep Help Prevent Forgetting Rewarded Memory Representations in Children and Adults?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Does Sleep Help Prevent Forgetting Rewarded Memory Representations in Children and Adults?
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, June 2018
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00924
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander Prehn-Kristensen, Annie Böhmig, Juliane Schult, Anya Pedersen, Christian D. Wiesner, Lioba Baving

Abstract

Sleep fosters the consolidation of rewarded memory representations in adults. However, sleep and its memory-supporting functions change through healthy development, and it is unclear whether sleep benefits the consolidation of rewarded memory representations in children as it does in adults. Based on previous findings, we expected sleep to benefit the consolidation of rewarded memory representations in children more than it does in adults. For that reason, 16 children (7-11 years) and 20 adults (21-29 years) participated in this experiment. During the encoding session, participants were asked to learn the location of 18 object pairs. Thereafter, one-half of the object locations were allocated to a high-rewarded condition and the other half to a low-rewarded condition. In the sleep condition, the encoding session took place in the evening (for children 7-8 pm, for adults 8-9 pm). After a fixed retention interval of 12 h the retrieval session was conducted the next morning (for children 7-8 am, for adults 8-9 am). In the wake condition, the time schedule was the same but reversed: the encoding session started in the morning (for children 7-8 am, for adults 8-9 am), and retrieval took place in the evening (for children 7-8 pm, for adults 8-9 pm). Sleep/wake had no impact on the memory performance regarding the low-rewarded memory items. In contrast, wakefulness in comparison to sleep reduced the memory performance on high-rewarded memory items. The interaction between sleep/wake and the degree of reward on memory performance was only significant in children. These results show that 12 h of wakefulness can deteriorate the memory performance for high-rewarded representations, whereas sleep can prevent the forgetting of these rewarded representations. It is discussed whether ontogenetic changes in sleep may play a role in conserving relevant but fragile memory representation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 19%
Other 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Researcher 2 7%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 9 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 9 33%
Neuroscience 5 19%
Computer Science 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2018.
All research outputs
#7,229,557
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#10,472
of 31,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,941
of 330,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#326
of 663 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 663 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.