↓ Skip to main content

A Survey of Automatic Facial Micro-Expression Analysis: Databases, Methods, and Challenges

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
21 X users
patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Survey of Automatic Facial Micro-Expression Analysis: Databases, Methods, and Challenges
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, July 2018
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01128
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yee-Hui Oh, John See, Anh Cat Le Ngo, Raphael C. -W. Phan, Vishnu M. Baskaran

Abstract

Over the last few years, automatic facial micro-expression analysis has garnered increasing attention from experts across different disciplines because of its potential applications in various fields such as clinical diagnosis, forensic investigation and security systems. Advances in computer algorithms and video acquisition technology have rendered machine analysis of facial micro-expressions possible today, in contrast to decades ago when it was primarily the domain of psychiatrists where analysis was largely manual. Indeed, although the study of facial micro-expressions is a well-established field in psychology, it is still relatively new from the computational perspective with many interesting problems. In this survey, we present a comprehensive review of state-of-the-art databases and methods for micro-expressions spotting and recognition. Individual stages involved in the automation of these tasks are also described and reviewed at length. In addition, we also deliberate on the challenges and future directions in this growing field of automatic facial micro-expression analysis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 168 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 23 14%
Researcher 19 11%
Student > Master 17 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 2%
Other 14 8%
Unknown 75 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 42 25%
Engineering 15 9%
Psychology 10 6%
Neuroscience 6 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 3%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 80 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,789,451
of 25,838,141 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#5,506
of 34,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,451
of 340,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#159
of 722 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,838,141 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,815 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 722 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.