You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dual Process Theory of Thought and Default Mode Network: A Possible Neural Foundation of Fast Thinking
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01237 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Giorgio Gronchi, Fabio Giovannelli |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| China | 1 | 14% |
| India | 1 | 14% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 153 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 7% |
| Researcher | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 14% |
| Unknown | 43 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 35 | 23% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 15 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 29 | 19% |
| Unknown | 50 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,501,867
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#3,020
of 30,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,089
of 296,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#100
of 720 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,246 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 720 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.