The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Longitudinal Estimation of the Clinically Significant Change in the Treatment of Major Depression Disorder
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01406 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cristina Cañete-Massé, Maribel Peró-Cebollero, Esteve Gudayol-Ferré, Joan Guàrdia-Olmos |
| Abstract |
Background: Although major depressive disorder is usually treated with antidepressants, only 50-70% of the patients respond to this treatment. This study applied Jacobson and Truax's (1991) methodology (reliable change index, RCI) to a sample of depressive patients being treated with one of two antidepressants to evaluate their functioning and the effect of certain variables such as severity and age. Method: Seventy-three depressive patients medicated with Escitalopram (n = 37) or Duloxetine (n = 36) were assessed using the Hamilton depression rating scale over a 24-week period. Results: They indicate that the RCI stabilizes in an absolute way starting in week 16, and it is not until week 24 that all of the patients become part of the functional population. We found limited statistical significance with respect to the RCI and the external variables. Conclusion: Our study suggests the need to accompany the traditional statistical methodology with some other clinical estimation systems capable of going beyond a simple subtraction between pre and posttreatment values. Hence, it is concluded that RCI estimations could be stronger and more stable than the classical statistical techniques. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 14% |
| Researcher | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 9% |
| Librarian | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 23% |
| Unknown | 4 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 8 | 36% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 23% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2018.
All research outputs
#17,985,001
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#20,892
of 30,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#237,739
of 330,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#583
of 720 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,483 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 720 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.