↓ Skip to main content

A Cross-Level Study on Family Involvement and Job Satisfaction

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Cross-Level Study on Family Involvement and Job Satisfaction
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, August 2018
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01547
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hongguo Wei, Jinqiang Zhu, Hai Li, Diana Bilimoria

Abstract

This study aims to explore how various dynamics of working couples' family involvement shape their job satisfaction. With a sample collected from primary school teachers and spouses in China (n = 236), we use polynomial regression, response surface method, and multilevel structural equation model to capture the various dynamics of working couples' family involvement. We found that (1) high-high spouses' family involvement has a negative impact on individual job satisfaction, and low-low spouses' family involvement is positively related to individual job satisfaction. (2) High-high spouses' family involvement benefits the creation of positive affect at the family level, which decreases family-to-work conflict and mitigates its negative impacts on individual job satisfaction. (3) Working couple's perceived work-to-family enhancement moderates the relationship between spouses' family involvement and positive affect at the family level. This study extends our understanding of family-to-work spillover effects from the viewpoint of dynamic interaction between spouses at the cross level.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Lecturer 1 5%
Professor 1 5%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 8 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 3 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 11 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2018.
All research outputs
#18,646,262
of 23,099,576 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#22,634
of 30,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,211
of 334,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#644
of 748 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,099,576 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 748 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.