↓ Skip to main content

Groups and Emotional Arousal Mediate Neural Synchrony and Perceived Ritual Efficacy

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Groups and Emotional Arousal Mediate Neural Synchrony and Perceived Ritual Efficacy
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, October 2018
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02071
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philip S. Cho, Nicolas Escoffier, Yinan Mao, April Ching, Christopher Green, Jonathan Jong, Harvey Whitehouse

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 18%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 6%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 12 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 11 22%
Neuroscience 9 18%
Social Sciences 4 8%
Computer Science 3 6%
Arts and Humanities 3 6%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 13 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2021.
All research outputs
#7,390,005
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#10,682
of 32,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,350
of 353,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#324
of 806 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,031 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 806 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.