The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
When a Placebo Is Not a Placebo: Problems and Solutions to the Gold Standard in Psychotherapy Research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02317 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cosima Locher, Jens Gaab, Charlotte Blease |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 10% |
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 21 | 72% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 79% |
| Scientists | 5 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 85 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 12% |
| Researcher | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 18% |
| Unknown | 22 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 34 | 40% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 25 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2024.
All research outputs
#2,305,878
of 26,491,309 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#4,664
of 35,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,182
of 451,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#141
of 777 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,491,309 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,464 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 777 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.